Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Davis v. Contreras
as 4:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
T. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Contreras v. District Attorney of Edwards County
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
John A. Contreras
Defendant:
District Attorney of Edwards County and Judge of the 452nd District of Edwards County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong et al v. Sheriff of Ellis County et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Armstrong, Richard Johnson, Lazaro Contreras and others
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County, Ellis County Sheriff Office, Ellis County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Carter et al
as 7:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Paige L. Carter, Cody S. Miller and Bryan D. Reitsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff Larry Smith
as 6:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Benito Contreras, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Contreras-Zamora v. USA
as 4:2023cv01016
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Contreras-Zamora
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Contreras-Beltran v. Warden Smith
as 3:2023cv01326
Petitioner:
Catherine Contreras-Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
