Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CARLETON v. PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant:
PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MAINE STATE PRISON and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACDONALD v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAIL ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINNEY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
RON OLDFEILD, CORRECTIONS OFFICER THORN, ALISON OUELETT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MORGAN KINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
SARGEANT MORAN, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CADETT and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI DWIGHT STOKES
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SC v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER HARRIMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN COGGINS and SC
Defendant:
KEVIN JOYCE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER HARRIMAN and CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORREST v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
RYAN FORREST
Defendant:
JILL BROOKS, BONDAR, CORPORAL, MATT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEALL v. CORRECTION OFFICER BECKER
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEALL
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER BECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FISHER v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A FISHER
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, JIM FOSS, CARMEN LEAVITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAPOMARDA v. SKIBINSKI, CORRECTION OFFICER et al
as 2:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
FRANK LAPOMARDA
Defendant:
SKIBINSKI, CORRECTION OFFICER , DICKEY, SGT , MUNSON, SGT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
