Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cross v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2022cv00557
Petitioner:
Jonathan Cross
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bellamy v. Cross et al
as 5:2019cv02650
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections Medical Division and Stephen Cross
Plaintiff:
Donald Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. BOP et al
as 9:2019cv01026
Defendant:
A. W. Jansan, U.S. Government, Warden Ramirez and others
Petitioner:
Antonio K Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Harrell et al
as 4:2018cv03376
Defendant:
Dr. Hoey, Davis, Mr. Cross and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson v. Waid et al
as 0:2018cv02626
Defendant:
Randolph Waid, Alexander McDold and Micheal Cross
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Alexander McDonald and Chad B. Simpson
Petitioner:
Daniel Mixson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Rabon et al
as 0:2018cv01846
Defendant:
Lawrence Cross, Michael Bunnell, Larry Rabon and others
Plaintiff:
Ubaldo Arriaga Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Meeks et al
as 2:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gorostieta Hernandez
Defendant:
B J Meeks, Stephen Hoey, L Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northcutt et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv03301
Plaintiff:
Clinton Northcutt , Bayan Aleksey , James Bryant and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Joseph McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cross et al
as 4:2017cv02498
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith
Defendant:
Lawrence Cross, Dr. Hoey, A. W. Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Riffle et al
as 4:2017cv02499
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith
Defendant:
Riffle, R. Goodman, Dr. Hoey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
