Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Currie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Marshall James Currie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Shelton v. Shelton et al
as 6:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donnel J. Shelton
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Sheriff Craig Shelton, Officer Anthony Garza and Dist. Attorney Tonda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Montford Unit
as 4:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Tony Curry
Defendant:
Montford Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Reyes et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Curry
Defendant:
Ricky J. Reyes, Quaja Goodman, James Montford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Curry et al
as 4:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph M Curry, Amanda J. Gregory, Susan Boedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. The Tim Curry Center et al
as 4:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael Rios
Respondent:
The Tim Curry Center, Acclaim Physicians, Pro Path Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
