Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Donaldson et al v. City of Dayton Ohio Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ora Joseph Donaldson, Jr and Patricia Hammer
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio Police Department, Timmy Battley, Officer Jeremy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Sivert, et al
as 1:2021cv01630
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Defendant:
SGT. Buddy Sivert, City of Lorain, Police Officer Steyven G. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Peace and Tara T. Peace
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. Melinda Taylor, S. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ms. Melinda Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Tara T Peace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Gray
as 1:2019cv00594
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Mohr et al
as 3:2017cv02631
Plaintiff:
Clifford T. Johnson
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Neil Turner, Shelly Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Jenkins
as 3:2017cv01441
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00586
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Mohr et al
as 3:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
Clifford T. Johnson
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Neil Turner, Shelley Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00114
Petitioner:
Patrick M. Curry
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
