Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Curry Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Cogburn et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
Max O. Cogburn, David Cayer, David Keesler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CATRINA AMELIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SIMERSON v. TODD et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
JONATHAN TODD, SIMMONS, CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Jackson, et al.
as 5:2022ct03080
Plaintiff:
Reuben Curry
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Denise Jackson, Donnie Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
RICKY SHANE CURRY
Defendant:
OFFICER J. RICHARDSON and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
