Cases 1 - 10 of 43
King, Jr. v. Unknown Defendants
as 9:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Unknown Defendants
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2023cv02483
Petitioner:
Jeffery David King
Respondent:
Moses Andre Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Kivika A. Brumble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Kivika Brumble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Kourtney S. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. WCI Officers
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
David King
Defendant:
John L. Norton, III and WCI Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Officer M. Rininger
as 1:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
David King
Defendant:
Officer M. Rininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
