Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Randy Sauls and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Network for Victim Recovery of DC (NVRDC) and ACLU of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Kolton Chase Wiggins
Defendant:
Mark Anderson, Loreal Lee, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobble v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv03635
Petitioner:
Daniel Cobble
Respondent:
Warden, U.S. G.D.P. Director in DC and U.S. Marshall Chief in Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd v. Palmer et al
as 1:2019cv03655
Defendant:
Supervison of DCS, Four Field Probation Officers, Frank Nattiel and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haile v. U. S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2016cv00255
Petitioner:
Abiy Mezemer Haile
Respondent:
U. S. Attorney General, U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security, Field Office Director-Atlanta Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abraham v. U. S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2016cv00256
Petitioner:
Teklom Michael Abraham
Respondent:
U. S. Attorney General, U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security, Field Office Director-Atlanta Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
