Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Whitley v. Reyes et al
as 1:2023cv21267
Plaintiff:
Glen Christopher Whitley
Defendant:
James Reyes, B. Wheeler, B. Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. STEPHENS et al
as 4:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO GOMEZ
Defendant:
MRS STEPHENS, MR ALLEN, MR D FOSKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. COWENS et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
SHELTON R THOMAS
Defendant:
DOCTOR KENNETH COWENS, NURSE DEBORAH TYMES, LT PATRICIA THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 4:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Johnnie Denmark and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 3:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Superintendent Timothy Morris, Warden Johnnie Denmark and Superintendent Earnest Lee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denmark v. United States Of America
as 2:2021cv00056
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Jarvis Maurice Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denmark-Wagner (ID 93947) v. Schnurr
as 5:2020cv03087
Petitioner:
Charles Denmark-Wagner
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOUNTJOY v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2020cv04685
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, F DENMARK and LAUBAUGH
Plaintiff:
RODNEY CRAIG MOUNTJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENMARK v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv00830
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Petitioner:
DARRYL DENMARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
