Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Foor v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foor v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUMMET v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; MEDICAL/DENTIST EMPLOYEES
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LEE BRUMMET
Defendant:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; MEDICAL/DENTIST EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wharton v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Wharton
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail, St Joesph County Jail Dentist, N.P./Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUNTER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv02015
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY GUNTER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CIF DENTIST, ROBERT STAFFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. RHODES et al
as 2:2020cv00686
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FCI DENTIST, RHODES and VAN WAGNER
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. WEXFORD et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEMONAE LEWIS
Defendant:
DENTIST, WEXFORD and CUSTODY OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Carter
as 3:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Cody W Phelps
Defendant:
Rob Carter, L A VanNatta, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CORIZON et al
as 2:2017cv00388
Defendant:
CORIZON, DENTIST, GRIEVANCE and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
