Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WASHAM v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2023cv02586
Petitioner:
THOMAS S. WASHAM
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrew Gines v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas
as 23-2127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GINES
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
HOUGH v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
CHAMPION OC'EAN HOUGH
Defendant:
JUDGE CAPPELLI, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FREDERICK JACK STALLSTEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNIE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv06155
Respondent:
DAWN CLARK, MARY ALICE BRENNAN and ALL JUDGES OF DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Petitioner:
HINDOLUI KENNIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIMAIO v. GEORGE W. HILL INTAKE DEPT. et al
as 2:2019cv01043
Defendant:
CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT FOR PREVIOUS COMPLAINTS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF MISDIRECTION FOR OVERCROWDING AND MISTREATMENT OF INMATES DUE PROCESS PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE OF PRISONERS, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and GEORGE W. HILL INTAKE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
MASTER DOMENIC J. DIMAIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Talbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN J. WHELAN, District Attorney, Delaware County, PA and others
MCDONALD v. DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2011cv01072
Petitioner:
HARRY F MCDONALD
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, J. BRADLEY, E. PARHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEAVER v. KURYAN et al
as 2:2011cv02684
Plaintiff:
KEITH BEAVER
Defendant:
JOHN D. KURYAN, DELAWARE COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, STANLEY KOVACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
