Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council and Kinetik Justice
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, John Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Petitioner:
Arnaldo Mercado, Dustin Brewer and Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dustin Frazier
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jervis Brown, Hernaadis Harmon, Barry Cobb and others
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Hugghins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00637
Plaintiff:
Odesius LaCharles Bryant
Defendant:
Thomas Hugghins, Blake Turman, Covington County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Ferman Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaston v. Ward
as 5:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Roderick Gaston
Defendant:
Dustin T Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Council v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2020cv01439
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council
Defendant:
Denise McKenzie, Jeremy Pelzer, Dustin Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
