Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Polk v. Placer County et al
as 2:2016cv01034
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Polk
Defendant:
Placer County, Edward Bonner and CFMG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Bonner et al
as 2:2014cv00757
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Fisher
Defendant:
Edward Bonner and R Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Bonner v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-41228
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD BONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bonner v. Stephens
as 3:2011cv00513
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bonner
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Carlton et al
as 2:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Davis
Defendant:
C. Carlton, Edward Bonner and David Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Bonner v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 08-20750
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD BONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bonner v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv03242
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bonner
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bonner v. Kent
as 4:2007cv04501
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bonner
Defendant:
Samuel B Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00264
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bonner
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Gayle et al
as 4:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bonner
Defendant:
Johnny Ray Gayle, III, Carroll E Wilborn, Nathaniel Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
