Cases 1 - 10 of 52
SISK v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2018cv00404
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01855
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01789
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., KENNETH GRAY and others
Fourth Party Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMBS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2013cv02041
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER and EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
TONY TOOMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. BUSS
as 1:2012cv00481
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HULL v. BUSS et al
as 1:2012cv00340
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, KEITH BUTTS, ALLEN FINNAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bained v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Bained
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Indiana Department of Corrections , Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLLINS v. BUSS
as 1:2011cv01618
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALENZUELA v. BUSS
as 1:2011cv01514
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
JESUS VALENZUELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-BEY v. BUSS et al
as 1:2011cv01204
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, MARK DODD and STEPHEN T. HALL
Plaintiff:
SHEIK FRANCIS SMITH-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
