Cases 1 - 10 of 1,103
Webb v. English et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Becker, IDOC, LeAnn Ivers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert K Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alina Hardy v. Vallie Bowman-English, et al
as 24-4057
Petitioner:
ALINA HARDY
Respondent:
VALLIE BOWMAN-ENGLISH, Clerk of Court and CORRECTIONS COMMISSION OF NORTHWEST OHIO, Board Members
Cotto v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Defendant:
Lauren Rogers, Brian English, Baili Appleton and others
Plaintiff:
David Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlow v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Defendant:
CO, Snow, English and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Harlow and Aaron Justin Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlow v. Hamlyn et al
as 3:2024cv00956
Defendant:
Hensley, MAT Comitty, Amber Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Justin Harlow and Aaron Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00945
Defendant:
Brian English, J. Owens and A. Cervantes
Plaintiff:
Donte R Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotto v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00921
Defendant:
Katina Murray, Joshua Snow, Montrel McGee and others
Plaintiff:
David Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Bowman-English
as 2:2024cv04144
Petitioner:
Alina Hardy
Respondent:
Clerk of Court Vallie Bowman-English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Noojin v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Defendant:
Michael Gapski, Brian English, Robert Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Branton Noojin and Branton A Noojin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Defendant:
C. Anderson, Ana Dowdy, S. Eason and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
