Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Koon v. Stirling et al
as 4:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Dennis Patterson, Warden McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Holder et al
as 9:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
Theron Jermaine Thompson
Defendant:
Eric Holder, William Nettles, Travis M Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Carroll v. United States et al
as 5:2014cv02167
Plaintiff:
Cory Conell Carroll and Brian Schumaker
Defendant:
United States, Eric Holder, Charles E Samuels, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRONIN v. DUFFEY et al
as 5:2013cv03423
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
SCOTT DUFFEY, VERONICA HNAT, BRIAN BOLLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense, The et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
John R Demos
Defendant:
US Secretary of Defense, The, CIA Director, Barack H Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Warren v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Joyce Zoldak, William G Stewart, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Lewis v. Samuels et al
as 4:2012cv02684
Plaintiff:
Larry Jamie Lewis
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Eric Holder, Jr., John Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Taylor v. Holder et al
as 0:2012cv00986
Petitioner:
Milton Joseph Taylor
Respondent:
Eric Holder, US Parole Commission and John Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Petitioner:
Rashad Saleem Muhammad
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Mathew Modica and Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
