Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cooper v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv01947
Petitioner:
Johnathan Eugene Cooper
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00390
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Johnathan Eugene Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eugene Cooper v. DOC, State of Florida
as 10-12181
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
Cooper v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2009cv00083
Petitioner:
William Eugene Cooper
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02359
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cooper v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00524
Petitioner:
William Eugene Cooper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cooper v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2008cv00340
Petitioner:
William Eugene Cooper
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCrea v. SCDC et al
as 4:2008cv01291
Plaintiff:
David McCrea
Defendant:
SCDC, Florence County of, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cooper v. Department Of Corrections State of Florida
as 0:2006cv61671
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cooper
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections State of Florida and Department Of Corrections State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Hamidullah et al
as 4:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cooper
Defendant:
Matthew B Hamidullah and David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
