Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ewings v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
Johnnie Ewings
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Worley v. Ewing et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Charles Johnston, Betsy Jividen and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Kummer et al
as 2:2018cv01514
Defendant:
Lt. Baisden, CO I Ewing, CO II Kummer and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamp v. Jividen et al
as 2:2018cv01364
Defendant:
Ralph Terry, Kenneth Bolen, Charles Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Lamp, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Bowlin et al
as 2:2018cv00946
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Kim Bowlin, Charles Johnson, David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. BOP-Warden Masters/Williams et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Petitioner:
K. Latham
Respondent:
BOP-Warden Masters/Williams, BOP-DHO Devereaux and BOP-C.O. B. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ewing v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Petitioner:
Mizell E. Ewing, III
Respondent:
Veltri, Ann Mary Carter, General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ewings v. OBrien et al
as 1:2011cv00153
Petitioner:
Ronnie Ewings
Respondent:
Terry OBrien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
