Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CHOWDHURY v. WOOD et al
as 1:2017cv03491
Petitioner:
EZAZ KABIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
KIMBA M. WOOD , STATE OF NEW YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Choudhury v. United States of America
as 17-1370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ezaz Kabir Choudhury
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Choudhury v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv05494
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ezaz Kabir Choudhury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crittle v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv03979
Plaintiff:
Ajamu Crittle
Defendant:
United States of America, Belen Ezaz, Raul Cespedes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crittle v. Ezaz et al
as 3:2013cv00743
Plaintiff:
Ajamu Crittle
Defendant:
Belen Ezaz, Raul Cespedes, Randy Tews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crittle v. Ezaz et al
as 3:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ajamu Crittle
Defendant:
Belen Ezaz, Raul Cespedes, Randy Tews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faye Slice v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 12-15726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAYE ELISE SLICE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, Western Regional Director FBOP, PAUL COPENHAVER, FBOP Dublin Warden, DR. BASILE, FBOP Dublin Health Services Director and others
Serrano v. Ezaz et al
as 5:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Serrano
Defendant:
Belen Ezaz, Marcus Pang, A.W Syed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howerton v. Tews et al
as 5:2011cv04360
Petitioner:
Rosie Marie Howerton
Respondent:
Tews, Pang and Ezaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santiago v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv03837
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Santiago
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Sheila Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
