Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Frasier v. Pritchard et al
as 2:2023cv04163
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Defendant:
Det. Pritchard, Officer Hall, North Charleston Police Department, S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frasier v. Duncan
as 1:2022cv02165
Petitioner:
Moses Akhonaton Frasier
Respondent:
Stephen Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frasier v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Dyshan Frasier
Defendant:
Georgetown County and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frasier v. Alden et al
as 4:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden Bailey, Ridgeland Corr. Insti. Medical Staff, Assoc. Warden A. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frasier v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 4:2020cv04123
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frasier v. USA
as 6:2020cv01848
Petitioner:
Joseph Nathaniel Frasier, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baumann v. McFadden et al
as 8:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Judy Baumann
Defendant:
Tyrone Heyward, Timothy Gilmore, Warden Joseph McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Frasier et al
as 5:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Perry Drake Gilmore
Defendant:
Grealin Frasier and Lieutenant Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frasier v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2017cv02972
Petitioner:
Edward J Frasier
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Scarlett Wilson, Al Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frasier v. Carolina Center for Occupational Health et al
as 9:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Frasier
Defendant:
Carolina Center for Occupational Health, Nurse Morris, Nurse Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
