Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas v. Polizzi et al
as 9:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Polizzi, Louis Pingotti, Jamie M. LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pingotti et al
as 9:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
William A. Thomas
Defendant:
L. Pingotti, G. Gardner, J. Taylor-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussey v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jewell A. Bussey
Defendant:
T. Miller, K. Gignor, G. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner, et al v. Arrowchis, et al
as 13-4122
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDSON G. GARDNER, Uintag Indian Descendent and LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ
Respondent - Appellee:
TEX ARROWICHIS, Ute Tribal Chief, UTE INDIAN TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE and UTE TRIBAL COURT
Gardner v. Petry
as 12-4158
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDSON G. GARDNER
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDGE G. A. PETRY
Morman v. 22nd JDC St. Tammany, LA et al
as 2:2012cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jesse L Morman
Defendant:
22nd JDC St. Tammany, LA, St. Tammany Parish TAS Force, James Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Smith
as 11-4249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Parks
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, John Maly, Deputy Supt. of Security, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, G. Gardner, Lieutenant, Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Gardner v. Arrowichis
as 2:2011cv00781
Petitioner:
Edson G. Gardner
Respondent:
Tex Arrowichis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner et al v. Reynolds
as 2:2011cv00733
Petitioner:
Edson G. Gardner, Lynda M. Kozlowicz and John A. Slim, Jr.
Respondent:
William Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gardner et al v. Salazar
as 2:2011cv00719
Petitioner:
Edson G. Gardner
Plaintiff:
Lynda Kozlowicz
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
