Cases 1 - 10 of 11
IN RE: TIMOTHY LEE GRIER
as 5:2024cv02751
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ERIC PEENYPACKER, CHRISTOPHER HALL and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE GRIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRIER v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv03790
Plaintiff:
DAVID VAUGHN GRIER
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, NANCY GIANETTI and C/O JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
GRIER v. DALBALSO et al
as 1:2018cv00114
Petitioner:
EMMITT GRIER
Respondent:
THERESA DALBALSO, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIER v. COUNTY OF PETERSBURG VA et al
as 2:2014cv04660
Plaintiff:
BRANDON A. GRIER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PETERSBURG VA and SHANE HOBLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. Cruz et al
as 1:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allan Lim
Defendant:
Rolando Cruz, Max Field, Jack Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYONS v. ICKES et al
as 3:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS
Defendant:
CAROL ICKES, C/O FLICK, DOCTOR BENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAPP v. BRAZILL et al
as 5:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
SEAN TAPP
Defendant:
DANNY BRAZILL , ANDY PROTO, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grier v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2010cv00738
Petitioner:
Calvin Grier, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
