Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clark v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Justin James Eugene Clark and Lilly Faith Clark
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Garry Lewis, Rojo and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWKIRK v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00210
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
GARRY NEWKIRK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00189
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, GARRIS, LAURIE PETTY and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO LAWRENCE HAYES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEAY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv01559
Medical Service Provider For D.O.C:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICES C.M.S.
Last Name) Correctional / K-9 Officer (P.C.F:
DAUGHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE LEMMON and T. WHITE
Plaintiff:
GARRY SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOLER v. MARBERRY
as 4:2009cv00091
Petitioner:
GARRY L. TOLER
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LISTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00299
Petitioner:
GARRY LISTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LISTER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00016
Petitioner:
GARRY LISTER and KENYA TRAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SEAY v. BUSS
as 1:2007cv01402
Petitioner:
GARRY SEAY
Respondent:
EDDIE BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SEAY v. BUSS
as 1:2007cv01393
Petitioner:
GARRY SEAY
Respondent:
EDDIE BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seay v. Buss
as 3:2007cv00354
Petitioner:
Garry T Seay
Respondent:
Eddie Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
