Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Hawkins v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00294
Plaintiff:
Charco A. Hawkins and Charco Arlando Hawkins
Defendant:
Nurse Anthony, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., K. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Charco A. Hawkins and Charco Arlando Hawkins
Defendant:
Anthony Edwards, Captain Tuck, Bill Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv01900
Defendant:
Kenneth Peters and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Tarus Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv00735
Defendant:
Kelly Guthery, Walter Wilson and S Boatwright
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hawkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
Charco A. Hawkins
Defendant:
Captain Smith, Lt. Toddie, DeAngelo Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 4:2019cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Pamela Harris, Charlotte Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael Daryl Hawkins
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Captain Welch and Lt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
