Cases 1 - 10 of 39
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00755
Petitioner:
William Howard, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ortiz v. Coakley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Raul Ortiz
Defendant:
LT D. Coakley, CT M. Duff, LT D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Lovett
as 3:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Paul Kenneth Howard
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Wolfe
as 3:2021cv00184
Petitioner:
Kendrick Howard Hughes
Respondent:
R.M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Warden
as 1:2021cv00122
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Petitioner:
Howard Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graening v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2020cv00400
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Randall Mutter, Tara Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Howard Graening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Stevens et al
as 2:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Justice, Jr.
Defendant:
CO Stevens and Charleston Area Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chinn v. Sereal et al
as 3:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Major Aldridge, Western Regional Jail and Superintendant Sereal
Plaintiff:
Mike Smith, Donald Porter, Jeffrey Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
