Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harmon v. USA
as 5:2023cv00401
Petitioner: Dwight Harmon
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harmon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02160
Petitioner: Rashad Harmon
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02019
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
WATSON v. HARMON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff: TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant: LISA HARMON, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States et al
as 5:2021ct03158
Defendant: Lawrence Sichel, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Connors et al
as 5:2020ct03189
Defendant: J. Wade, Director Inch, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff: Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Inch et al
as 5:2019ct03356
Defendant: Counselor Denson, B. Coor, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: Burl Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officers et al
as 5:2019ct03316
Defendant: Director Inch, Thomas R Kane, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff: Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McNeill v. Joyner et al
as 5:2015ct03144
Plaintiff: James C. McNeill
Defendant: Carlton Joyner, Pamela J. Locklear, Marshall Pike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Of America
as 5:2012hc02051
Petitioner: Harmon Jones
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?