Cases 1 - 10 of 47
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Respondent:
JANET HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant:
WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON, FCI McKEAN FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HEAD, COMPOUND SUPERVISING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RASHID v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00331
Petitioner:
MASHIYAT RASHID
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WISE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BLAKE WISE
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WISE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BLAKE WISE
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADAMS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
DENICO ADAMS
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN L. HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCGILL v. WARDEN HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
KEITH B. MCGILL
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTLETT v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
ALAN M. BARTLETT and Alan Michael Bartlett
Defendant:
JANET HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIVAS v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
JUAN ANDRADE RIVAS
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BELTRE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
JOHNNY BELTRE
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
