Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ethridge v. Tarrant County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Brent Alan Ethridge
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriffs Office, JPS Community Healthcare, C/O FNU Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. King et al
as 6:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jason Kittrell and Jason Irvin Kittrell
Defendant:
Sherry L. King and Joe N. Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Innocent Projects of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Innocent Projects of Texas and Donna Irvin Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin-Bey v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Duane Irvin-Bey and Jermaine Duane Irvin
Defendant:
Joshua Burgess, Nancy Pelosi, House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela v. United States Of America
as 3:2019cv00333
Petitioner:
Irvin Randu Valenzuela
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peters v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2019cv03808
Defendant:
Ashley England, Texas Medical Board, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakely v. Andrade
as 3:2018cv03229
Respondent:
Candance Carlsen, Brandon Howell, Dallas County and others
Petitioner:
Quincy Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peters v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board, State of Texas, Barbara Gladden Adamick and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2018cv02922
Defendant:
Ray George, R Lenning and Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Irvin Omara Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
