Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Thomas
Defendant:
Capt. Thomas, Captain Jenkins and Lt. Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fortson v. Jamison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
David Rogers, J. Thomas, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Fortson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Tyus
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Damian J. Thomas
Defendant:
Kenneth Tyus, Karl Nelson and Wanda Lightening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Watkins
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Phyllis Billups, Kim J. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadnax v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Broadnax
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim J. Thomas, Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00902
Plaintiff:
Carmice Reon Hill
Defendant:
Kim J. Thomas, Leon Forniss, Classification Tant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
