Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12546
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
CAMERON T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DAVID ARCHER, COLE BANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEEYLEN v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00756
Defendant:
WILSON, VINCENT STANLY, SCOTT CALLAHAN and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 1:2017cv04695
Petitioner:
James Jones
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson, Clark Atlanta University, Tommy Sankey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Caesar et al
as 1:2017cv03089
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Antonio Caesar, M. D. Edwards, Clark Atlanta University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tate, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 11-12788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. TATE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERSON CI WARDEN, D. MCCARTER and others
James Tate, Jr. v. Secretary DOC, et al
as 11-11451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. TATE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. H. CANNON, Warden, D. MCCARTER, Captain and others
Tate v. McNeil et al
as 8:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, T.H. Cannon, D. McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00261
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, T. H. Cannon, D. McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, T. H. Cannon, D. McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
