Cases 1 - 10 of 15
POLK v. CLARK et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Defendant:
SGT. CLARK, BYRD, CLERANCE F. BIRKHEAD and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Norman et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Allen Norman, County of Cleveland, North Carolina, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. EDEN POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
EDEN POLICE, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. J. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ball et al
as 5:2021ct03219
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Ball and Nurse McCormich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 7:2019cv00025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darius J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PULLIAM v. STAFFORD et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY RAY PULLIAM
Defendant:
W. R. STAFFORD, J. WILLIAMS, KEITH ROY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hall
as 5:2015hc02120
Petitioner:
Theodore J. Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Headen et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013ct03213
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Headen, Theodore J. Williams, Adam Troy Kittrell and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Quentin T. Summer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013ct03050
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Williams
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James C. Dever, III, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
