Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2021cv01776
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Jane Doe/John Doe and John Doe/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2021cv00733
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Goodhue County Health and Human Services, Katherine McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Ronald Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv02172
Defendant:
Jeffrey Peterson, Robert Elsen, Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doranti v. Churchill et al
as 0:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Minnesota Public Radio Central Office, Mike Zachary, John Lund and others
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Minnesota Sentencing Commission, Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Milton and Milton Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00453
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Nick Olson and Nicholas Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00454
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Guy I. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliday v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00458
Defendant:
Minnesota Sentencing Commission, Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Holliday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunker v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00446
Plaintiff:
Mark Dunker
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spicer v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00447
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Spicer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
