Cases 1 - 10 of 103
MONROE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Defendant:
JEFFREY R. COOKE, MITCHELL JOHNSON, JAMIE ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
DEVONTA J. MONROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohlman v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02125
Petitioner:
Jeremy Bohlman
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Amy E. Ray, Michael Bornstein, Walter H. Paramore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al -
as 4:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Joseph Dunnebacke, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Jeremy Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Kent Holtberg and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
FNU Lay, FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremy Marquis Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jefferson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Jeremy Marquis Jefferson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Breeden v. Eason et al
as 5:2024ct03087
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Eason, Correctional Officer Wargo, Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
JEREMY NICHOLAS MYNES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
