Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HOUSER v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHARLES HOUSER
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, JULIEANE SWAIN and JULIANE EDNA FRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSER v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES HOUSER
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kenney v. USA
as 1:2016cv01188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kenney v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01030
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Respondent:
Jeffrey E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenney v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv02887
Plaintiff:
John Charles Kenney
Defendant:
Jeffrey E. Thomas, Sarah Dees, Andrew M. Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenney v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv02743
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Respondent:
Jeffrey E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenney v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv01563
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KOEHLER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2008cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES KOEHLER
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EICHINGER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv04434
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES EICHINGER
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
STEELE v. UNITED STATES
as 3:2007cv00247
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES STEELE, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
