Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-1371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
WILLIAMS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, EARL JONES, ALEXIS SECARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
RONNY J. WESTERFIELD
Defendant:
ALEXIS SACARA, MICHAEL CLARK, DOCTOR JOSE BOGGIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Reyan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Captain John Doe One, PA-C Nicole Odem, Dr. Scott Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Dalmer Lee Reyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Defendant:
DORINA VARNER, JOHN WETZEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D'HAPPART and others
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUTLER v. SISSEM et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
HOWARD SISSEM, DELANEY, JERI SMOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. BOGGIO et al
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant:
JOSE BOGGIO, ROBERT MAXA, JERI SMOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitenight v. Harry et al
as 4:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Shawn Whitenight
Defendant:
Laural Harry, Dorian Verner, Ed Shoop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Altenbach v. Tony Ianuzzi, et al
as 15-3668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ALTENBACH
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY IANUZZI, Nurse Practicioner, PHYSICIAN JOHN LISIAK, PHYSICIAN JOSE BOGGIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
