Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04193
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Bennett et al
as 4:2024cv00898
Defendant:
C/O Augie Martin, Sgt. Julie Poirier, Lt. Adam Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04094
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naylor v. Judge Wagner, et al
as 5:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Naylor
Defendant:
Judge Wagner, Missouri Department of Corrections, Crossroads Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Parson et al
as 2:2023cv04119
Plaintiff:
Dustin A Hayes
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Anne L. Precythe, Julie Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04009
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Politte v. Kempker
as 4:2022cv01169
Petitioner:
Michael Bernard Politte
Respondent:
Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Inman et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. McGee
Defendant:
Julie Inman and Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Inman et al
as 4:2021cv01307
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas McGee
Defendant:
Julie Inman and Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
