Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Seabrook v. Doe #3 et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Onaje Kudura Seabrook
Defendant:
Jane Doe #3, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hollingsworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01745
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Michael Beedy, Sam Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Morley et al
as 2:2019cv02469
Defendant:
Shontate Morley, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02006
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Timothy Jackson, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Janoblin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Bethea et al
as 0:2019cv00508
Defendant:
Ofc. Carroway, A/W Sharp, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriquez v. Reid et al
as 4:2017cv03490
Plaintiff:
Julio Rodriquez
Defendant:
Dr. Reid, Jane Doe-1-nurse and Jane Doe-2-medical administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Montgomery et al
as 0:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah
Defendant:
Tammy Montgomery, Kennth Downing, Mickey Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Greenville County Detention Center et al
as 5:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shannon Johnson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center, Scott Bodiford, Lt Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bolt v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2010cv01374
Plaintiff:
C Allen Bolt
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
