Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TARN v. YOCUM et al
as 2:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
JARRETT MELVIN TARN
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSEPH YOCUM, CORPORAL JOSEPH O'DONNELL and OFFICER STEVEN DOUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JARRETT v. LUTHER et al
as 1:2019cv00046
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
GEROD MAURICE JARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASTELONIA v. HOLLENBUSH et al
as 1:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Castelonia
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Patty Kulagaski, Mr. Shuman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTELONIA v. HOLLENBUSH et al
as 2:2018cv04567
Plaintiff:
JARRETT CASTELONIA
Defendant:
BRIAN DAVIS, PATTY KULAGASKI, KOVACLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montalban v. Powell et al
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jose Montalban
Defendant:
Powell, Verbyla Williams, Jason Glossenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Maiorana
as 3:2015cv01931
Petitioner:
Jarrett M. James
Respondent:
Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06757
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICASTRO v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2014cv00732
Petitioner:
ROBERT JARRETT NICASTRO
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JARRETT v. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv07244
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JARRETT
Defendant:
COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER COMPANY, JOHN CLANCY, RODNEY BROCKENBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Fenstermaker et al
as 3:2013cv00877
Plaintiff:
Jarrett James
Defendant:
Erika Fenstermaker, Ryan, Breckon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
