Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lopez v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
Mauricio Javier Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mauricio Alvarez Lopez v. Estela Derr
as 22-16002
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICIO JAVIER ALVAREZ LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ESTELA DERR
Lopez v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
Mauricio Javier Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Kenneth Watson, Raymond Winger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Parker
Defendant:
Ivan Madrigal, Ismael Alvarado, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Kenneth Watson, Winger Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2019cv00248
Defendant:
Brooke Langlois, P V Scon, FNU Lozano and others
Plaintiff:
John Eric Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambriz v. Federal Correctional Institution - Big Spring
as 1:2018cv00201
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution - Big Spring, FNU LNU, Angela Willborn and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ambriz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01224
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ciro Caicedo-Obando v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 16-11514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CIRO CAICEDO-OBANDO
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. PETROSKY, Food Service Supervisor, also known as C.O. Petrosky, JUAN DELEON, Food Service Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
