Cases 1 - 10 of 1,476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Jane Doe No. 1 et al
as 7:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shea Terry
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Doe No. 1, Wellpath Health Services, Dr. John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Francis
Defendant:
Doctor Mullens, Medical Staff Jane Doe or John Doe, Jane Doe or John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
John L. Brooks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Working
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Walter Ferguson
Defendant:
John Working
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
