Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STEELE v. HARTNESS
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JODIE LEE STEELE, II
Defendant:
JOHN D. HARTNESS, J. MATHE-LY and J. RORRER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullard v. Johnson
as 5:2014ct03294
Plaintiff:
John D. Bullard
Defendant:
Brian C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters-El et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03293
Plaintiff:
Travis Peters-El, Jorge Galeas Jr., Jose J. Moreno and others
Defendant:
United States of America, State of North Carolina, Pasquotank County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas Jr. et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03225
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr. and John D. Bullard
Defendant:
United States of America, State of North Carolina, County of Pasquotank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leatherwood v. NCDPS Dept. of Adult Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00220
Petitioner:
John D. Leatherwood
Respondent:
NCDPS Dept. of Adult Corrections and State of NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
John D. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Stephen Iyevbele, K. Scheimreif and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Iyevbele et al
as 3:2011cv00153
Petitioner:
John D. Matthews
Respondent:
FNU Riley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGESS v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
EBAY, INC., PAYPAL, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEST v. VANEEKHOVEN et al
as 1:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANTHONY WEST
Defendant:
ROXANN L. VANEEKHOVEN and JOHN D. BARBER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leatherwood v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
John D. Leatherwood
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
