Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Jose Alvarez v. Brian Williams, et al
as 23-15918
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE IRAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Vasallo-Alvarez v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Jose Vasallo-Alvarez
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez v. Unknown Medical Provider et al
as 3:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Provider, Unknown Estelle Unit UTMB Provider, Jeremy Samuel Somerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez, Jr. v. Peralta
as 5:2020cv00769
Defendant:
Jesus Peralta, Sergeant FNU Valdez, Lieutenant FNU Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denis v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv08773
Plaintiff:
Jose Heberto Alvarez Denis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr. v. Jesus Peralta, et al
as 5:2019cv00613
Defendant:
F/N/U Miller, Unknown White Male Corrections Officer, F/N/U L/N/U and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Peralta et al
as 5:2018cv01228
Defendant:
J. Garcia, Jesus M. Peralta, FNU Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVAREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv04072
Petitioner:
JOSE M. ALVAREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN BRYAN ANTONNELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarez-Salas v. USA
as 5:2018cv00200
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Alvarez-Salas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Alvarez v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2018cv04146
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Plaintiff:
Jose S Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
