Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hasanati v. Edwards
as 3:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Jahi Amadi Hasanati
Respondent:
Joseph Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hasanati v. Edwards
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
Jahi Amadi Hasanati
Respondent:
Joseph Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv60230
Plaintiff:
Anthony Holley
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Joseph Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holley v. Edwards et al
as 8:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Anthony Holley
Respondent:
Joseph Edwards and Reception and Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv02961
Petitioner:
Anthony Holley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Joseph Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RENNE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00845
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD RENNE and JOSEPH EDWARD RENNE, III
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RENNE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD RENNE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'amico v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Officer McGee, C/O Deas and others
Plaintiff:
Steven F. D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Amico v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Robert Smith, Joseph Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Steven F. D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
