Cases 1 - 10 of 27
ROCHELLE v. BOYER
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
NORRIS DWAYNE ROCHELLE
Defendant:
JULIE CATHERINE BOYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwartz v. Krug et al
as 5:2022ct03148
Plaintiff:
John Schwartz and John Thomas Schwartz
Defendant:
Eric Krug, Mike Regal, Julie Osbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BONE EL v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
KEENETH DIGGS, MS. DUNLAP, JULIE J. WHITLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE BONE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER v. FRIESE et al
as 1:2019cv01031
Defendant:
PHILIP KEVIN BERGER, JEFF HUX, BEVERLY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble et al v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2019cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Kimble, Jr, Kevin Guy, Shamar Royal and others
Defendant:
David Cothron, G. Swink, Kenneth Lassiter and others
Kimble v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Kimble, Jr
Defendant:
G. Swink, Julie Jenkins and David Cothron
Myles v. Harnett County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2018ct03097
Plaintiff:
Devontay D. Myles
Defendant:
Harnett County Sheriff Department, Wayne Coats, Julie Planko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Corpening et al
as 1:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamar McFadden
Defendant:
Hubert Corpening, Donald Watkins, Julie Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Kearney et al
as 5:2017ct03053
Plaintiff:
Steven Fitzgerald Saunders
Defendant:
Stephen Kearney, David P. Maloney, Peter Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
