Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Robertson et al v. Louisiana Board of Pardons et al
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Allen Robertson, Jr, Anthony Bell, Daniel Joseph Blank and others
Petitioner:
Jason Reeves
Defendant:
Gregory C Brown, Lederrick Campbell, Louisiana Board of Pardons and others
Not Classified By Court:
Shawn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gumns et al v. Edwards et al
as 3:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
Julius Allen, Daniel Gumns, Ernest Rogers and others
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, John Morrison, Stephen R. Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trahan v. Swartz et al
as 2:2019cv10145
Defendant:
Lt. Swartz, Tommy Rodgers, Gordy Dove and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Paul Trahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Murray v. Lucascio et al
as 2:2017cv02973
Plaintiff:
Julius Cornell Murray
Defendant:
Keith Lucascio, Steven Abadie and William Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Gusman et al
as 2:2015cv04861
Plaintiff:
Julius Daniel Alexander
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Lt. Givens, Capt. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Givens
as 2:2015cv01201
Plaintiff:
Julius Daniel Alexander
Defendant:
Clinton Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maracalin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00935
Plaintiff:
Julius Warner Maracalin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tony Valencia, R Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Darbonne et al
as 2:2011cv00954
Plaintiff:
Desmond Charles Parker
Defendant:
Daniel Darbonne and Julius Rolland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Terrell et al
as 2:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Julius Jaramal Williams
Defendant:
Terry Terrell, Anthony Allemond, March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
