Prisoner Petitions Cases
Kai Ingram v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Kai Ingram v. B. Rudzienski, et al
as 23-2145
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee: B. RUDZIENSKI, Greene Hearing Examiner
INGRAM v. SCHWAB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01665
Plaintiff: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant: COUNSELOR SCHWAB, SUPT. WILSON and JOHN/JOAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kai Ingram v. Smithfield SCI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1541
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee: SMITHFIELD SCI
INGRAM v. RUDZIENSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant: B. RUDZIENSKI, MICHAEL J. ZAKEN, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant: SCI SMITHFIELD UNIT MANAGER RUNK, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF PAROLE KIRK C. LOOSI, C. GORMAN and others
Plaintiff: KAI D. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kai Ingram v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 17-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY
Ingram v. SCI Dallas Correctional Officers et al
as 1:2016cv02302
Plaintiff: Kai D. Ingram
Defendant: SCI Dallas Correctional Officers, Burress, Krakowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kai Ingram v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 15-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?