Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Marvin Kent
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Straugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martindill v. Pate et al
as 4:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Randall Martindill
Defendant:
Mark Pate, Edwards, Justin Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Alan Kent Sharp
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Timothy Macomas and Melissa Sisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parris v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Kent D Parris
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Clayton Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kent Mahaffey
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Douglas et al
as 4:2021cv00360
Defendant:
Kent C Krause, William R Simpson and Amy Jackson Douglas
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
