Cases 1 - 10 of 38
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Figueroa v. Borne et al
as 5:2023ct03129
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rodriguez-Figueroa
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Borne, C/O Moneymaker, C/O Deane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. County of Onslow et al
as 5:2021ct03278
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ray
Defendant:
County of Onslow, Detective John Getty and Judge Kent Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Deal et al
as 5:2021ct03031
Defendant:
Robert Downs, Alan Seilbeck, Dustin Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delgado v. Autry et al
as 5:2021ct03011
Defendant:
Lisa Miles, R. Kent Harrel and Hanna Autry
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Matthew Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Deal et al
as 5:2020ct03359
Defendant:
Kent Woody, Robert Downs, Alan Seilbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. County of Franklin et al
as 5:2020ct03286
Defendant:
John Doe Detention Officers, Southern Health Partners, Inc., RLI Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. County of Franklin et al
as 5:2020cv00475
Defendant:
John Doe Detention Officers, Southern Health Partners, Inc., RLI Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
