Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 5:2024ct03113
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Greer et al
as 5:2023ct03244
Plaintiff:
Keith Bayseam Oliver
Defendant:
Detective Marley Greer and Captain Karen Riggsbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris et al
as 5:2023ct03159
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stewart
Defendant:
Brandeshawn Harris, Peter Buchholtz, Daryll Vann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIZZEL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GRIZZEL
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ABBY BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Littlejohn v. Bullard
as 5:2023ct03104
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNELL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE CONNELL, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS and SHERIFF VAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
DAVEN WAYNE ADAMS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
