Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff: Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant: Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tyler v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02097
Petitioner: Branden Tyler
Respondent: Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KELLY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00427
Petitioner: JAKE ROBERT KELLY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff: Lawrence Woodard
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner: Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent: Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant: Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner: Lamar Middleton
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. American Bar Association
as 5:2024ct03047
Plaintiff: Steven Kelly and Steven James Kelly
Defendant: American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Porter v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02030
Petitioner: Wayne Porter
Respondent: L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff: Charles Clemens
Defendant: FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?